Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has described the girl accusing him of sexual assault as being “full of sh*t” after she despatched him a textual content saying she “didn’t want to do that”, a courtroom has been instructed.
The 35-year-old Dally M winner sat within the witness field of the NSW District Court on Wednesday because the jury was performed the ultimate recording of his prior proof.
His NSW District Court trial is nearing its finish after Mr Hayne pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual assault with out consent.
Mr Hayne denies sexually assaulting the girl at her house on Newcastle’s outskirts in September 2018, on the night time of the NRL grand closing, claiming they engaged in consensual sexual acts.
The former footy star is accused of pulling off the girl’s pants earlier than allegedly performing oral and digital sexual acts on her with out her consent, inflicting cuts and substantial bleeding.
Hours of Mr Hayne’s recorded proof has been performed to the jury this week, with the ultimate hour performed on Wednesday.
In his closing questions by the then Crown prosecutor, Mr Hayne was requested why he was “fuming” after a girl despatched him a textual content saying she was in bodily ache.
“I know I’ve talked about sex and stuff so much but I didn’t want to do that after knowing the taxi was waiting for you,” the textual content learn.
“I thought you would have at least stayed. I am hurting really badly. I told my mum you got a nose bleed but I’m sitting here in my room crying because I feel weird.”
Mr Hayne replied: “Go doctor tomorrow.”
The then Crown prosecutor proposed to Mr Hayne: “The reason you were fuming is because you knew from the messages that she was going to ruin your career … you were fuming because she was going to refer you to police.”
“I was fuming because she was just full of sh*t,” the previous NRL star responded.
He earlier instructed the courtroom: “I was fuming by that stage because I could see she was trying to make up something that wasn’t true, about her saying no and that I left straight away.”
Earlier in his proof, Mr Hayne admitted he knew the girl didn’t need to have intercourse with him.
He stated he paid a taxi $550 to drive him from Newcastle to Sydney after a buck’s weekend and instructed the girl he might ’pop in on the best way’ to her home if she lived close to the freeway.
The former Parramatta fullback instructed the courtroom he knew the girl was ‘keen, sending flirty messages’ within the weeks prior, however when requested what he meant to do at her house, he stated he ’wasn’t positive’.
‘It was up in the air … best-case scenario I would have sex with her, worst-case I would introduce myself and that was it,’ Mr Hayne instructed his then-barrister within the proof.
Mr Hayne insists that he knew the girl was not consenting to sexual activity however as an alternative he tried to ‘please her’ by performing different sexual acts.
‘I knew she didn’t need to have intercourse, I assumed I’d simply please her and that was it,’ he stated.
The Crown requested: “You went for one thing and one thing only and that was sex wasn’t it?”
“Potentially,” Mr Hayne responded.
He earlier denied he needed intercourse “the quicker, the better” after leaving the taxi outdoors the girl’s home with the meter operating.
Mr Hayne was requested by the then Crown prosecutor: “What you wanted was sex, and you wanted it the quicker, the better because the taxi was out the front and the meter was continuously running.”
Asked what he stated to that, Mr Hayne responded: “I don’t agree with your opinion.”
Later, the girl contacted Mr Hayne through Snapchat in a message that was monitored by police.
In it, she wrote: “You knew I definitely wasn’t OK from the damage that night” and “it was pretty messed up and you should have stopped when I said so”.
The trial continues earlier than Judge Graham Turnbull.
Source web site: www.foxsports.com.au
