Rugby World Cup 2023: Wallabies lose to Fiji, news, Eddie Jones, response, evaluation, Wales, subsequent sport

Fiji has been lavished in reward after their beautiful upset win over the Wallabies on the Rugby World Cup.

But the Australians have been roundly slammed following a primary loss to the Flying Fijians since 1954.

Here’s how media around the globe reacted to the 22-15 defeat.

Boxing: Canelo vs Charlo SUN 1st OCT 12PM AEDT | Tszyu vs Mendoza SUN fifteenth OCT 12PM AEDT | Order Now with Main Event on Kayo Sports

‘It’s a STUNNER’: Fiji elated at FT! | 00:42

FIJI PRAISED FOR CLINICAL PERFORMANCE

Writing for The Times, Mark Palmer criticised the Aussies’ “hamfistedness” in comparison with the spectacular efficiency from the Fijian facet.

“Fiji dominated – were the more composed, clinical and clever team – but Australia refused to go quietly”, he wrote.

“It was tight and it was taut, but Fiji were comfortably the more convincing,” Palmer added.

The Telegraph equally wrote: “They were comprehensively the better side in Saint-Etienne, a sign not only of their remarkable growth in a short space of time this year under Simon Raiwalui but also how far the Wallabies have dramatically fallen. The most shocking thing about the game was how normal it all felt.”

It added that Fiji had been “relentless over the ball at the breakdown as Australia’s attacks turned to dust.”

REPORT: Wallabies surprised by Fiji in epic boilover as 69-year low leaves Aussies on brink of WC catastrophe

REACTION: Rugby world reacts to ‘dreadful’ Wallabies ‘unravelling before our eyes’ as Aussie legend tees off

‘I deserve whatever I get’: Jones sorry as Wallabies coach opens up on brutal name to hook younger star

In The Guardian, Andy Bull wrote: “Fiji did not over-run Australia so much as they just shut them out of the match. They were sharper in their decision making, stronger in the set‑pieces, and more disciplined around the field.”

He added: “the surprising thing was Australia never looked close to winning this one.”

Alex Bywater wrote for the Daily Mail: “Famed for being rugby’s greatest ad-libbers, Fiji put the razzle-dazzle away and won in a very un-Fijian traditional way: Breakdown domination, brick-wall defence, and relentless commitment for 80 minutes.”

Nick Mucalvenny wrote for Reuters that it was: “a thoroughly deserved 22-15 victory that blew Pool C wide open and left the twice world champion Wallabies shell-shocked. Denied a likely victory over Wales in their opener by a dropped pass, Fiji overpowered the Australians with direct running, explosive tackling and 11 turnovers.”

Scottish rugby nice Scott Hastings posted on Twitter: “OMG! The rugby world cup has just exploded into oblivion! Fiji have just beaten Wallabies”.

Meanwhile, the Australians had been ill-disciplined, conceding 18 penalties to seven from their opponents, with a raft of sloppy errors in possession.

Daniel Gallan wrote in The Guardian: “Australia lacked cohesion and composure. They’d follow up a slick move down the line with an aimless kick to no one. A swift steal on the ground would precede a knock-on. A dominant carry would come to nothing as the necessary support at the ruck failed to arrive.”

He added that “inaccuracy at the ruck and an inability to stifle the relentless Fijian fetchers meant the Wallabies’ free-wheeling jazzy vibe took on a staccato beat. There was no tempo, no rhythm. It was a tough watch for anyone with gold in their heart.”

Kiwi sports activities author Ollie Ritchie wrote: “Maybe as bad as the Wallabies have been all year. Utterly dreadful”.

And Wallabies legend David Campese wrote for Planet Rugby: “As a proud Aussie it pains me to watch the Wallabies lose to Fiji without really firing a shot and looking so short of basic rugby skills and IQ.”

He added: “Fiji murdered Australia at the breakdown, both on the floor and in carrying into contact. Seven steals tells you all you need to know about how poorly the Wallabies protected their own ball …”

Throw ‘croissants at me’ Jones owns loss | 02:52

Coach Eddie Jones has earned his justifiable share of criticism too, along with his choices closely panned.

Sonny Bill Williams stated on Stan after the sport: “These selections, I’m going to call it how it is. We’re in a high performance arena and sometimes you live and die by your decisions and Eddie Jones got found out tonight unfortunately.”

Particularly criticised was Jones’ Fiftieth-minute withdrawal of fly half Carter Gordon after a nightmare sport.

Jones stated afterwards: “Carter is a young 10, he’s going to have those days mate. I think I’ve said this before, he’s going to have those days but he’ll bounce back, he’s a good young player.”

Gordon’s lowlight was a disastrous choice to let a kick bounce as an alternative of taking it on the total, resulting in Joshua Tuisova scoring within the nook simply minutes into the second half.

Gallan wrote within the Guardian: “One moment summed up their ineptitude. A box kick was hoisted high and Carter Gordon zeroed in on it. Nawaqanitawase had his back turned but his eyes fixed on the dipping pill. Both jumped towards it without conviction and allowed it to bounce, a cardinal crime in this game.”

Palmer wrote in The Times: “Australia were all over the place … Jones’s first move was to remove the erratic Gordon from the line of fire, with Donaldson going to fly half, Nawaqanitawase to full back and Suli Vunivalu coming onto the right wing.

“Amid this considerable reshuffle, we – and presumably Jones – again had pause to wonder whether it might have been simpler just to pick Quade Cooper in the first place.”

The Telegraph claimed: “Hooking their young fly-half Carter Gordon on 50 minutes, after he had been disastrously at fault for Tuisova’s try, was a damning statement from Eddie Jones.

“There’s no denying that this is a callow Australian side by design from Jones, with Michael Hooper and Quade Cooper among the veterans left out and an eye clearly on the future. But the way Australia failed to convert their brief spells of pressure into points should have Jones worried, along with the way Fiji won breakdown penalties with such frequency that no Australian ruck felt safe.”

The Australian staff was definitely younger – with injured Will Skelton dominated out last-minute to the shock of no-one, and Taniela Tupou additionally set to overlook the essential conflict in opposition to Wales after a knee damage.

It was a tough loss for the Aussies.
It was a tricky loss for the Aussies.Source: Getty Images

But Wallabies nice David Campese wrote for Planet Rugby: “Sure, losing players like Will Skelton and Taniela Tupou didn’t help our cause but World Cup campaigns are based on squads, not individuals, and it was our squad and leadership that came up short.

He added: “This was a side that have no clue how to attack and do not know each others’ games in terms of attack.”

There’s little question that Fiji delivered a much more mature efficiency – and a wake-up name for Rugby Australia in regards to the Wallabies’ standing within the world sport.

Gallan wrote in The Guardian: “The real question is where this leaves Australian rugby as a concept. How on earth can a team outside of the Six Nations or Rugby Championship hand them such a pasting?

“Fiji didn’t win this through mindless ball carries from muscled men with little regard for their safety. Australia were outwitted, outfought and outclassed. They become the first so-called tier-one nation to succumb to a side that still scrapes an existence in relative obscurity between World Cups … If nothing else, let this game compel those in charge of their sport, especially at Rugby Australia, to share a field with the smaller nations that have given as good as they’ve got this tournament.”

Bull wrote in The Guardian: “The odd thing was that it was the Fijians, so often the underdogs, who played the role of the elder sibling. All the development work – especially, as Jones noted, the introduction of the Drua into Super Rugby – is paying off for them, and it feels like the balance of power in the Pacific is finally shifting.”

“Jones’s team is a young Australian side, and will get better,” he added. “They were at their best in the final quarter when, the head coach noted, they were fielding their youngest side in almost 30 years. But still, given the directions in which these two teams are heading, you wonder when, if ever, the Fijians will start as second favourites in this fixture again.”

Source web site: www.foxsports.com.au

Rating
( No ratings yet )
Loading...