Beijing stated Friday that it doesn’t ask corporations at hand over knowledge gathered abroad, as Chinese-owned TikTok faces requires a ban within the United States.
China “has never and will not require companies or individuals to collect or provide data located in a foreign country, in a way that violates local law”, international ministry spokesperson Mao Ning informed a daily briefing.
ALSO READ: TikTok workers can nonetheless entry Indian customers knowledge regardless of ban: Report
The Chinese authorities “attaches great importance to protecting data privacy”, she stated.
“The US government has so far not provided any evidence that TikTok poses a threat to its national security, but instead has repeatedly made presumptions of guilt and unreasonable suppression” in opposition to the corporate, Mao added.
“We have also noted that some in the US congress stated that seeking a ban of TikTok is a xenophobic political persecution,” she stated.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew confronted relentless questioning from combative US lawmakers on each side of the political aisle Thursday over the video-sharing app’s alleged ties to China and its hazard to teenagers.
The Harvard-educated former banker failed over greater than 5 hours to defuse an existential menace to TikTok because the app seeks to outlive a White House ultimatum that it both cut up from its Chinese possession or be banned within the United States.
“ByteDance is not owned or controlled by the Chinese government and is a private company,” Chew informed lawmakers in his opening remarks, referring to TikTok’s China-based mother or father firm.
“We believe what’s needed are clear transparent rules that apply broadly to all tech companies — ownership is not at the core of addressing these concerns,” Chew added.
At the crux of a lot of the fears over TikTok is a 2017 Chinese legislation that requires native corporations at hand over private knowledge to the state whether it is related to nationwide safety.
And in a single notably heated change Thursday, Chew was compelled to acknowledge that some private knowledge of Americans was nonetheless topic to Chinese legislation, however insisted that might quickly be modified.
The agency additionally acknowledged in November that some workers in China may entry European consumer knowledge and admitted in December that workers had used the info to spy on journalists.
But the group has insisted that the Chinese authorities has no management over or entry to its knowledge.
Source web site: www.hindustantimes.com
