Shipments of aviation gas proceed to achieve military-ruled Myanmar with the involvement of corporations from Asia and Europe, a brand new report claims, at the same time as junta air raids proceed to drive 1000’s of civilians from their houses.
In a brief report printed right this moment, Amnesty International, Global Witness, and Burma Campaign UK stated that they’d recognized extra overseas corporations concerned in supplying the Myanmar Air Force with gas, following a current Amnesty report that examined the position of overseas and multinational corporations within the nation’s aviation gas provide chains.
“We have traced new shipments of aviation fuel that have likely ended up in the hands of Myanmar’s military, which has consistently conducted unlawful air strikes,” Montse Ferrer, Amnesty International’s researcher and adviser on enterprise and human rights, stated in a assertion accompanying the report’s launch.
“Since the military’s coup in 2021, it has brutally suppressed its critics and attacked civilians from the ground and the air. Supplies of aviation fuel reaching the military enable these war crimes. These shipments must stop now.”
Since not lengthy after the army takeover, activists have been calling for overseas governments to limit the army’s entry to aviation gas. The requests have grown extra pressing because the army junta, struggling to quash the nationwide resistance to its rule, has used its air power towards civilian populations in numerous elements of the nation. According to the United Nations, the army carried out at the least 670 air assaults final 12 months, 12 occasions greater than the 54 recorded in 2021. Statistics from the Myanmar Institute for Peace and Security that have been cited within the Amnesty assertion claimed that the army performed 243 air strikes in 2022, up from 104 the 12 months earlier than.
Today’s report follows an investigation into the aviation gas provide chain that Amnesty printed final November, with help from different Myanmar-focused civil society teams. This revealed that gas supposed for civilian aviation was being diverted to the army. It additionally documented how shipments from overseas companies, together with main oil corporations like ExxonMobil, Thai Oil, PetroChina, and Rosneft, had facilitated the Myanmar air power’s devastating assaults on civilian populations.
One cargo documented within the new report concerned the oil tanker Prime V, which sailed from Sikka in India on November 28 of final 12 months, and later offloaded Jet A-1 grade aviation gas terminal within the port of Thilawa in Myanmar. The report recognized various overseas companies concerned within the transaction, together with Reliance Industries Ltd of India, which owns the terminal from which Prime V departed; Sea Trade Marine, a Greek firm, which is the useful proprietor of Prime V; and Japan’s P&I Club, which supplied it with safety and indemnity insurance coverage. The report additionally documented an identical separate cargo that left the Bangchak Oil Refinery in Bangkok Port in Thailand round October 8 and unloaded a cargo of jet gas at Thilawa every week or so later. The report claimed that this cargo concerned corporations based mostly in Thailand and Luxembourg.
The gas terminal in Thilawa was beforehand operated by Puma Energy Aviation Sun Co. Ltd. (PEAS), which was largely owned by the worldwide commodity buying and selling large Trafigura. Amnesty’s report from final 12 months described Puma Energy as “the main foreign business involved in the handling, storage, and distribution of aviation fuel in Myanmar.”
Puma Energy introduced final October it was withdrawing from Myanmar after promoting its belongings to a “locally owned private company,” which it stated would guarantee compliance with human rights requirements. But the eventual purchaser of the belongings was a Myanmar-based agency referred to as Shoon Energy, beforehand often called Asia Sun Aviation, a number of members of which have been sanctioned by the United Kingdom and European Union. Given the shut relationship between Shoon Energy and the Myanmar army, Amnesty stated that Puma’s assurance of human rights compliance was “essentially meaningless.”
Compared to the massive oil corporations named in Amnesty’s report in November, the companies recognized within the report are comparatively marginal, and in some instances concerned solely tangentially within the provide chain, comparable to within the provision of insurance coverage for gas shipments. This speaks to the complexity of the worldwide provide chains that join Myanmar’s army to a constellation of outdoor suppliers, insurance coverage brokers, sub-contractors, and maritime transport providers, one thing that has each benefits and downsides for these looking for to choke off the army’s entry to very important assets like gas.
While the Tatmadaw’s reliance on worldwide provide chains creates a possible stress level for out of doors actors, particularly highly effective Western governments, unpicking this tangle of interdependencies could be each virtually and politically troublesome.
Source web site: thediplomat.com
