The skyline of the Philippine capital Manila as seen from Manila Bay.
Credit: Depositphotos
The Philippine authorities stated it’s already reviewing the continued reclamation tasks in Manila Bay after the United States embassy expressed concern over their long-term environmental affect and the alleged involvement of a blacklisted Chinese agency.
The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) confirmed with reporters that it’s conscious of the problems raised by the U.S. embassy. “The DFA is fully committed to working with relevant government agencies to ensure the safety and well-being of diplomatic missions accredited to the Philippines,” a spokesperson of the company stated.
One of the accepted reclamation tasks in Manila Bay is simply 250 meters away from the U.S. embassy. In an announcement despatched to the media, embassy spokesperson Kanishka Gangopadhyay cited the irreversible harm that reclamation might trigger. “We have expressed concerns about the potential negative long-term and irreversible impacts to the environment, the resilience to natural hazards of Manila and nearby areas, and to commerce,” he stated.
The U.S. worries echo the longstanding opposition of inexperienced teams and native residents concerning the harmful affect of reclamation on marine habitats and the displacement of villages in coastal areas. Aside from the reclamation within the capital, a large new airport is being constructed on the reclaimed land of Manila Bay in close by Bulacan province. Residents additionally noticed that flooding circumstances have grow to be frequent after the resumption of reclamation actions over the previous a number of months.
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) stated it has fashioned a panel to evaluation the “cumulative affect” of all reclamation tasks. “What has happened here is that individual projects were somehow processed without taking into consideration the cumulative impact of all the projects together. This is actually critical for future use,” DENR Secretary Maria Antonia Yulo-Loyzaga stated in a media interview.
She added that reclamation may additionally undermine the federal government’s catastrophe response operations if a large earthquake hits the city area surrounding Manila Bay. “Reclamation has a certain value in terms of [the] economy. However, we need to do the cost benefit analysis in terms of impacts to geology and longer term impacts in terms of what could result from climate change,” Loyzaga stated.
The second concern of the U.S. embassy is the involvement of a blacklisted Chinese contractor within the reclamation challenge.
“We are also concerned that the projects have ties to the China Communications Construction Co. (CCCC), which has been added to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List for its role in helping the Chinese military construct and militarize artificial islands in the South China Sea,” the embassy stated in its assertion. “The company has also been cited by the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank for engaging in fraudulent business practices.”
Indeed, CCCC is at the moment enterprise backfilling operations that may create three synthetic islands in Manila Bay. The least the federal government can do is to confirm the declare of the U.S. embassy that the corporate has a job in creating Chinese buildings throughout the nation’s maritime territory. The security of the challenge also needs to be probed if the corporate is accused of participating in fraudulent practices.
A senator whose household is behind the reclamation that may construct inns and casinos in Manila Bay famous that the challenge underwent a rigorous evaluation. “They have gone through the process. It would be unfair if they question it now,” the senator stated. “Let’s respect the process.”
An official of the Philippine Reclamation Authority downplayed the U.S. issues: “These are all allegations from news outlets outside the Philippines that they’re involved in the reclamation of the West Philippines Sea… Their permits were processed so we assumed that they’re doing business here in a legal manner or lawful.”
The U.S. embassy has a sound foundation for flagging the danger of reclaiming giant parts of Manila Bay within the nation’s capital area, even when its present location was developed and expanded by reclamation. The fishermen’s group Pamalakaya urged the embassy to hitch different stakeholders in opposing reclamation in different elements of the nation.
“If the U.S. embassy is genuinely concerned about the marine environment, it should express opposition against every single reclamation project in Manila Bay and throughout the country, instead of just singling out a specific project that involves a Chinese firm and threatens its security protocols,” the group stated in an announcement.
As for the Philippine authorities, the data supplied by the U.S. embassy ought to alert it to evaluation the tasks accepted lately and discover out if there are different firms contracted to construct international installations throughout the nation’s territory. Otherwise, it might seem ludicrous for condemning China’s aggressive actions within the South China Sea on one hand, whereas welcoming buyers and builders who generate profits by enabling the violation of the nation’s sovereignty.
Source web site: thediplomat.com
