Worrisome incidents involving driverless automobiles in San Francisco are on the rise and are averaging about 90 reviews a month, the pinnacle of San Francisco’s Municipal Transit Authority informed MarketWatch in a current interview.
The SFMTA is one among three metropolis companies that lately joined collectively in letters of protest to the California Public Utility Commission — which regulates autonomous automobiles — forward of a listening to to evaluate proposed enlargement plans for Alphabet Inc.’s
GOOG,
GOOGL,
Waymo and General Motors Co.’s
GM,
Cruise, which might enable fare-generating robotaxis throughout town. A July listening to, which had been anticipated to offer the businesses the go-ahead to their deployment plans, has been rescheduled for Aug. 10.
As driverless automobile fleets have expanded operations throughout town, San Francisco public officers have had sufficient, and are talking out about security threats, with town’s hearth chief telling MarketWatch earlier this month that “They are not ready for prime time.”
Read extra: Driverless automobiles are driving San Francisco loopy — ‘They are not ready for prime time’
“We are up to 90 incidents per month … of varying degrees, some are minor, some are major obstructions,” stated Jeffrey Tumlin, the SFMTA’s director of transportation. “We have no regulatory authority, so we are trying to work with the CPUC for data-reporting requirements.”
The SFMTA additionally would love a extra gradual enlargement of autonomous automobiles, with limitations — like the following degree of a “learner’s permit.”
“We are very enthusiastic about this technology, but it is having significant negative consequences,” Tumlin stated.
In the previous few months, there have been an increasing number of complaints in regards to the autonomous autos driving across the metropolis, utilizing its as a take a look at mattress to be taught a number of the worst doable site visitors conditions to coach their techniques. Earlier this month, a gaggle of activists known as Safe Street Rebel initiated protests on TikTok and Twitter, asking individuals to position orange security cones on the self-driving automobiles, which causes them to cease.
While Safe Street Rebel has the identical considerations because the SFMTA in regards to the want for self-driving corporations to share extra knowledge with regulators, the act of putting security cones on prime of the driverless automobiles is definitely worsening the present downside. The SFMTA stated it doesn’t endorse any actions which will improve the variety of disabled autos on San Francisco streets.
Tumlin additionally stated that the data-gathering of driverless automobiles is incomplete, together with when the automobiles trigger main site visitors issues however don’t truly crash. “Right now there is no data collection around these hazardous conditions where the autonomous vehicle doesn’t crash into anything itself, but may be causing hazards for others on the roads,” he stated. “But even when they do crash, there is very little information about causality.”
A Waymo spokesman stated “the data to date indicates the Waymo Driver is reducing traffic injuries and fatalities in the places where we operate. In over a million miles of fully autonomous operations, we had no collisions involving pedestrians or cyclists, and every vehicle-to-vehicle collision involved rule violations or dangerous behavior on the part of the human drivers.“
Tumlin said that while the CPUC agrees that the current state of data is incomplete, the regulator disagrees with the SFMTA’s conclusions. One example cited in the protest letter was the SFMTA’s conclusion that based on Cruise data currently available, from June 2022 to February 2023, the rate of collisions — none of which resulted in injuries — “appears to exceed the collision rate for human drivers.” This was described within the CPUC’s draft decision on Cruise as a “good safety record.”
“We want industry to be transparent with us and what progress they are making,” Tumlin stated.
Also see: Watch what occurs when police pull over a driverless automobile in San Francisco
Tumlin didn’t wish to speculate on why the CPUC had postponed the assembly and vote till August, however stated he’s hopeful {that a} extra knowledge assortment can be required on the subsequent levels within the course of.
“We don’t expect autonomous vehicles to be perfect and we want them to succeed, but if AV companies want us to believe their safety claims, they should be comfortable sharing their data,” he stated.
It is a uncommon occasion when many San Francisco companies can truly agree, and driverless automobiles have result in a united entrance amongst officers in public transit, the hearth division, the police division and town’s Board of Supervisors. The Aug. 10 assembly represents an opportunity for regulators to really to decelerate driverless automobiles, and demand higher knowledge reporting necessities, earlier than it’s too late.
Source web site: www.marketwatch.com
