On August 12, Turkmenistan’s state news company (TDH) known as upon Turkmengas Deputy Chairman Myrad Archaev to answer “media reports regarding the idea of creating gas unions and alliances,” impressed by feedback made by a Russian Foreign Ministry official, Dmitry Birichevsky, the day earlier than.
This is a curious case of the Turkmen facet responding negatively to a suggestion Birichevsky didn’t actually make — no less than not within the interview printed and circulated. The tea-leaf readers could have a area day.
Back in November 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin, whereas assembly with Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev in Moscow, recommended forming a “trilateral [gas] union.” Tokayev, in line with an Interfax report, responded positively, “Why not?” Tokayev stated Putin was going to name the Uzbek president to debate it.
That preliminary report was topic to an rapid pushback and an effort at reframing, with the Kazakh facet clarifying that the 2 presidents had mentioned how “to coordinate joint actions for the transportation of Russian gas through the territories of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.” Tashkent chimed in, with Energy Minister Jurabek Mirzamahmudov setting apart the “union” terminology and stressing that, “If we import gas from another country, we cooperate only based on a commercial sales contract. We will never agree to political conditions in exchange for gas.”
Discussions have been ongoing since. In January, roadmaps had been signed between the 2 Central Asian governments and Russia on fuel cooperation and in February there was a gathering between the Kazakh and Uzbek vitality ministers and Gazprom Chairman Alexey Miller in St. Petersburg. What appeared to return from that assembly was a tentative plan to route fuel via the Central Asia-Center pipeline – a system managed by Gazprom that transports fuel from Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan into Russia – if technical hurdles, particularly enhancements essential to reverse the stream of the pipeline, could possibly be surmounted.
By April, it was extra clear that Russia’s curiosity wasn’t a lot supplying Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan however reaching China. A TASS report on the time cited evaluation by the Russian Energy Development Center, which contained the expectation that Gazprom “will be able to agree on the supply of up to 10 billion cubic meters of gas to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, of which 4-6 billion cubic meters will be transit gas for China.”
As of early June 2023 there had been some progress however no massive breakthroughs. Most importantly, amid the China-Central Asia summit in May, Uzbekistan had introduced that fuel provides to China, suspended amid its winter crunch, had resumed.
I argued that Uzbekistan had a while on its fingers to press for the perfect deal from Moscow, because the nation’s vitality shortages are solely acute within the wintertime. In the meantime, Kazakhstan seems to have been engaged on the technical query and many of the related infrastructure is in its territory. On August 14, Vlast.kz cited an vitality ministry spokesman saying, “Today, work is underway on the technical preparation of the Kazakh section of the Central Asia-Center gas pipeline for transporting Russian gas through Kazakhstan to Uzbekistan, which is scheduled to be completed on October 1.” He additionally stated, nevertheless, that there had been no official proposals from both the Russian or Uzbek sides.
Backing up barely chronologically, on August 11 Birichevsky – who’s the director of the Department of Economic Cooperation within the Russian Foreign Ministry – did an interview with Ria Novotsti (RIA), a Russian state-owned home news company. In that interview, he was requested if the “gas union” thought can be expanded past Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. He was additionally requested if it could be built-in into the Eurasian Economic Union framework.
Birichevsky replied that Russia doesn’t rule out the opportunity of increasing “trilateral cooperation in the gas sector” past Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. He even claimed, “We know that other states are also showing interest in it. We are open to such cooperation on the understanding that it should be mutually beneficial and constructive, taking into account the positions of all participants.”
Turkmenistan learn an terrible lot between these strains.
On August 12, TDH interviewed Turkmengas Deputy Chairman Myrad Archaev. Archaev requested some good questions on Birichevsky’s feedback:
Mr. Birichevsky’s assertion raises no less than just a few questions. What “expansion opportunities” are we speaking about, what “other states” are displaying curiosity in them, what, in precept, is behind the “trilateral cooperation” within the fuel sector? The streamlined language utilized by the Russian diplomat doesn’t present solutions to them. And full readability is required right here, because the pursuits of different states, together with Turkmenistan, are affected.
(We’re going to put aside the irony of a Turkmen official calling for “complete clarity.”)
Archaev then launched into a proof of Chinese fuel pipeline structure in Central Asia. Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan transport fuel east to China through the Central Asia-China fuel pipeline community, which presently has three functioning strains and a hypothetical Line D. Per Archaev, “out of the total agreed supply of 55 billion cubic meters per year [through the pipeline to China], 40 billion cubic meters are contracted by Turkmenistan, and the rest are provided by Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.”
Archaev then stated, “There are no sources of gas from other countries to fill the pipeline, and the existing scheme for distributing gas volumes supplied to China does not include plans to expand the number of participants in the Turkmenistan-China gas pipeline project.”
Archaev stated that “no consultations have been held with Turkmenistan” on the difficulty of adjusting agreed volumes and schemes, or altering using current infrastructure. “In this context, Turkmenistan is seriously concerned about the statements of official representatives that in one way or another affect the international obligations of our country, and may sow confusion and speculation about their implementation by other participants.”
In concluding, Archaev pressured that worldwide cooperation “should be based on open and clear criteria, mutual respect and consideration of interests, and strict observance of the agreements reached.”
“Fluctuations in the external economic environment cannot serve as a reason to change these principles.”
There’s loads to unpack on this, and so many tea leaves to learn, however for now I need to simply give attention to Turkmenistan’s shifting of the conversion. As all governments do, it places itself on the heart of the difficulty. Ashgabat could rightfully be involved that reversing flows within the Central Asia-Center pipeline (as famous above, a Gazprom community) to ensure that Russia to extra expeditiously provide fuel to China (as recommended in April) might undercut its personal enterprise with Beijing. Of course, Archaev didn’t instantly say that, however that’s what I learn between his strains.
Also of observe, simply forward of this alternate of statements, the presidents of Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan met collectively in Ashgabat on August 4. It was the primary such trilateral assembly, with Central Asian governments most frequently partaking with one another bilaterally or inside multilateral groupings – the aspirationally annual Central Asia Leaders Meeting is a more moderen invention.
After the trilateral assembly, Turkmen Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov stated Ashgabat deliberate to extend its quantity of pure fuel manufacturing by no less than an extra 60 billion cubic meters each to satisfy home demand and provide exports. “At the same time, the unconditional priority will be the supply of Turkmen gas to its closest neighbors – Uzbekistan and Tajikistan,” he stated.
And so, Turkmenistan may be involved that Russia will transfer to provide neighboring nations, like Uzbekistan, earlier than it could settle such offers itself. As two of Eurasia’s fuel giants, Russia and Turkmenistan are in direct competitors for patrons within the area. And Uzbekistan doubtless stands to learn by taking part in one off the opposite for the perfect value.
Source web site: thediplomat.com
